Ed. Note: This piece was originally written for and published on http://underwaterminefield.com/, 2/01/2012.
I knew I would love her the moment I saw her face. Those dead, unblinking eyes. That dream nose, like pinched into her flesh by the thumb and index finger of God Himself. Those lips – sneering while simultaneously evoking no emotion whatsoever. Blood-red and curling. That hair, whipped below her clavicles as if squeezed like frosting from a pastry bag.
And the voice – emanating from a throne in a castle among a pastiche of indulgent themes (Victorian, Byzantium, Pen and Tellerism, Americana) – what a voice! What an arousing and dangerous voice, especially to be trilling lines from Lolita and lyrics about “putting on a show for you, Daddy” and exhaustively detailed descriptions of acrylic nail art, down to the last diamond-studded palm tree.
But after the proverbial glow of the flashbulbs fades and you get a listen to the entirety of Born to Die, released Tuesday (hereafter referred to as “Lana Del Day”), you find out for yourself that even though you have no usable knowledge of music and tastes that fall into the category “generally questionable,” not to mention, an affinity for thinking that a person’s beauty ultimately determines her talent, the album is… sigh… not that great.
Don’t get me wrong – pre-Lana Del Day leaked demos will never stop being wonderful to me. Grandiose ballads “Video Games” and “Blue Jeans” will be, for years to come, in the running for musical background to the climactic scene in the movie about my life (a scene in which I gallantly pluck a dropped Cheeze Ball from the floor and eat it), while cheeky pop ditties like “Diet Mtn Dew” and “You Can be the Boss” anchor a welcome jolt of girly joy to my morning commute soundtrack. It’s the deeper cuts that bore me, filler songs like “Dark Paradise” and “Summertime Sadness,” arriving on Born to Die overproduced and underwhelming, lacking any of the kitschy charm and saccharine wit of “Blue Jeans,” et al, and just about confirming the billions of volumes of criticism already developed about her by my more-informed peers.
But I don’t want to hate Lana. I want to love her – I mean keep loving her, I want to love her with the pureness and innocence and raw desire with which I loved her the moment I heard the first few febrile bars of “Video Games.” How do we save Lana for ourselves – I mean, me? – and keep her around for a bit longer, based on the way she made us – I mean, me? – feel when we first met her? What can stay, of all that Lana’s given us?
What people hate is her voice, most notably in her live performance on Saturday Night Live that fateful evening. What people also hate is her fakeness – lips about to burst with Restalyne, nymphet behaviors, aloof eye-rolling, inauthentic grins; all of it a great departure from her former bleach-blonde self, Lizzie Grant. People hate that she talks about trailer parks when she is the daughter of a millionaire. What does that leave? Lyrics – and hers are inarguably decadent, albeit inconsistent and sometimes nonsensical. Standing alone, pieces of them are beautiful confections, rising three-dimensionally from headphones and building themselves into direct representations of the clichés we all are loving, wearing, drinking, driving, doing with our friends. With her lyrics, regardless of whether her voice is always the appropriate vessel, Del Rey carries the sentiment of our generation and paints pictures of everyone’s favorite version of life: Old-fashioned Americana, riddled with modern influences, broken-down cowgirl-esque appeal, a touch of Appalachia with a glamorous, nail polish patina, all through an Instagram lens. Scatterbrained, unsure and occasionally inauthentic? Sure, but we all are, too – seen an Urban Outfitters catalog lately? Read Vice magazine lately?
Analyze the lyrics piecemeal, and you have a feast of us-ness. What do any of us want more than to be told we “taste like the Fourth of July,” or that when we “walked into the room, we made [someone’s] eyes burn”? Don’t we all want this to be what we look like and what we see on a Friday night out in Brooklyn: “I do my hair up, all high and wild / white flowers tied high / green swimming pool, pink flamingos, high Christmas lights / blue base spreading, silver tinsels”? And do you think “let’s take Jesus off the dashboard, he’s got enough on his mind” could be our very own Millenial motto?
I’m serious – as a writer, I admire these lovely turns of phrase and the scenes they set; Del Rey’s craftiness. You’re lying if you say you don’t. So what does Lana do best, then? Tell stories. Are they fantastical, a little weird, sometimes a bit plastic? Sure – but since when does that make for bad writing? Not to mention – since when do we turn our noses up at the subversive?
And like phoenixes from the flame that is the burning fuselage of Del Rey’s post-SNL career, so rose from her own pretty, mismatched words a host of critical insight with prose poised to match, as if music writers felt they had to step it up a bit, when it came to assessing our Queen with the Hydrangea Crown. When was the last time an artist got critics so riled up that they actually tried to make their reviews creative and beautiful, as if to compete? Like, fucking never. I mean, but I hardly read music reviews.
From Chris Richards at The Washington Post, we get this gorgeous summation: “So let’s remember this collective blush on our cheeks. At worst, this music is a black hole that’s swallowed far too many keystrokes and listening hours. At best, it’s a wide-open slab of meaninglessness — a space for us to project our anxieties about what pop stardom means to our shrinking attention spans.”
“The big theme: femininity as a scam, as lost girls preen for the gaze of imaginary sugar daddies,” Rob Sheffield writes for Rolling Stone, and it’s a statement oozing truth. Whether being a lost girl preening for the gaze of imaginary sugar daddies is a bad thing, though, I am not so convinced – sounds like a nice life to me, but then, I’m weaving my own hydrangea crown as we speak. And what an image to give us, Mr. Sheffield – sort of recalls a certain someone singing, with equal loveliness, “Sweet sixteen and we had arrived / Walking down the streets as they whistle, “Hi, hi!” / Stealin’ police cars with the senior guys / Teachers said we’d never make it out alive.”
“It is an island, this album, part of no movement,” begins Jon Caramanica of The New York Times, beautifully. And we then get to imagine Miss Lana on an island in the tropics, in the perfect dress, writing poetry, not an album, maybe humming to herself now and again, but letting that be enough. And then she rolls each piece of prose up and, not before kissing a lipstick stain onto each one, slips them into bottles and floats them off the shore, “in the tiki-lounge way of overemphasizing noir culture.”
And in his endlessly humbling review for SPIN, Rob Harvilla coins the phrase “Miley Cyrus noir” just for our girl, and chides us, “This record is not godawful. Nor is it great. But it’s better than we deserve. We broke her; we bought her.” Chills!
So what, then, has Lana given us in the end that may last beautifully? Some relevant writing, a bible of verse for us 20-somethings, a few gleaming sentences to slip into our cannon – even for the ones who are too cool to admit that they love the idea of someone tasting like the Fourth of July. Better yet, she gave us a lot of interesting writing for critics to write interestingly about. From her oeuvre sprung of the most insightful and most engaging music writing we’ve seen in a long time. Is she a champion of feminist theory? Is she a brilliant musician, an icon, a role model? Jesus, God, no. But she is a writer, in a sense, and she gave us all something to write about. That makes her an industry darling to me – just one who chose the wrong industry.


